ceo-advisor
Executive leadership guidance for strategic decision-making, organizational development, and stakeholder management. Use when planning strategy, preparing board presentations, managing investors, developing organizational culture, making executive decisions, fundraising, or when user mentions CEO, strategic planning, board meetings, investor updates, organizational leadership, or executive strategy.
1实现原理 · 为什么它能做到
主体是『CEO 职责框架 + 量化仪表盘 + 红旗清单』的提示词资产:五块职责(愿景战略 / 资本与资源 / 利益相关方 / 组织文化 / 董事会与投资人)各自指向一份 reference 深读文档。
### 1. Vision & Strategy Set the direction. Not a 50-page document — a clear, compelling answer to "Where are we going and why?"
自带两个标准库 Python 工具,但它们的定位是『可运行的评分模型』而非 CLI 分析器:脚本只 import json/typing/datetime/math,无参数解析、无文件与网络 IO,__main__ 里跑的是内置示例公司数据并 print 报告。
if __name__ == "__main__": # Example usage example_company = { 'name': 'TechCorp Inc.', 'market_position': { 'market_share': 35,
第二个脚本做三情景(base/bull/bear)财务建模,同样以硬编码示例驱动 __main__,暴露 analyze_financial_scenarios(base_case, scenarios) 供调用。
print(analyze_financial_scenarios(example_base_case, example_scenarios))
输出有硬格式与置信度纪律:Bottom Line → What(带信心标注)→ Why → How to Act → Your Decision,每条发现打 🟢 verified / 🟡 medium / 🔴 assumed 标签,且结果要过仓库统一的 Internal Quality Loop(自检 / 交叉职能互检 / Executive Mentor 预审)。
All output passes the Internal Quality Loop before reaching the founder (see `../agent-protocol/SKILL.md`). - Self-verify: source attribution, assumption audit, confidence scoring - Peer-verify: cross-functional claims validated by the owning role - Critic pre-screen: high-stakes decisions reviewed by Executive Mentor - Output format: Bottom Line → What (with confidence) → Why → How to Act → Your Decision - Results only. Every finding tagged: 🟢 verified, 🟡 medium, 🔴 assumed.
推理技术绑定为 Tree of Thought 并要求至少三条路径、按 upside/downside/reversibility/second-order effects 评估,按公司阶段调整时间视野。
## Reasoning Technique: Tree of Thought Explore multiple futures. For every strategic decision, generate at least 3 paths. Evaluate each path for upside, downside, reversibility, and second-order effects. Pick the path with the best risk-adjusted outcome.
上下文注入靠约定文件:每次回应前『总是』读 company-context.md(若存在),并允许角色向同僚发起 [INVOKE:role|question] 请求,形成 c-level 顾问团内的横向咨询。
- **Always** read `company-context.md` before responding (if it exists) - **During board meetings:** Use only your own analysis in Phase 2 (no cross-pollination) - **Invocation:** You can request input from other roles: `[INVOKE:role|question]`
量化部分以 CEO Metrics Dashboard 表格固化解读口径(ARR 增速、runway>12 个月、burn multiple<2x、NPS>40、regrettable attrition<10%、战略工作时间占比>40% 等),使建议可被指标反驳。
| **Capital** | Months of runway | > 12 months | Monthly | | **Capital** | Burn multiple | < 2x | Monthly |
横向协作矩阵把 CEO 与其余 C-suite 角色按场景挂钩(COO 转 OKR、CFO 募资建模、CHRO 文化诊断、CISO 风险态势…),并由 c-level-advisor/CLAUDE.md 的架构图给出『Chief of Staff 路由 → 10 角色 → Executive Mentor 批判 → Decision Logger 记忆』的全景。
| Setting direction | COO | Translate vision into OKRs and execution plan | | Fundraising | CFO | Model scenarios, prep financials, negotiate terms | | Board meetings | All C-suite | Each role contributes their section |
2核心能力
4管控建议与判定依据
- scripts/: 执行本地脚本或命令: python scripts/strategy_analyzer.py(SKILL.md Quick Start 明示;实际执行的是模块 __main
- 本地工作目录: 文件读写与工件输出: 间接:c-level-advisor pod 的其它 skill(decision-logger、company-os)负责落地记忆与决策日志,不在本
5第二遍独立确认
- [ok] skill 路径(任务书标『待定位』) — 实际相对路径 c-level-advisor/skills/ceo-advisor;仓库内另有 .gemini/skills/ceo-advisor(生成镜像,逐字相同)、.hermes/.vibe 打包树,以及 c-level-advisor/ceo-advisor.zip(见下条)。
- [ok] 『两个 Python 工具』的真实能力 — 两脚本确实存在且可独立运行,但都只含内置示例数据、无 argparse/无输入输出文件参数:strategy_analyzer.py 的 __main__ 构造 example_company(TechCorp Inc.)后 print;financial_scenario_analyzer.py 的 __main__ 构造三个示例情景后 print。如实测能力应为『可复用的评分函数库 + 演示运行』,SKILL.md Quick Start 的三行注释('Analyze strategic options with weighted scoring' 等)描述的是函数能力而非 CLI 行为,未夸大但易被误读。
- [discrepancy] 随包 zip 与目录版本不一致 — c-level-advisor/ceo-advisor.zip 内的 ceo-advisor/SKILL.md 是旧版:505 行、frontmatter 无 license/metadata、description 为 'Comprehensive CEO leadership skill providing strategic planning frameworks, financial scenario modeling, board governance guidance, investor relations strategies, and organizational leadership tools. …',条目时间 2025-10-18/19;目录内为 169 行、version 2.0.0、updated 2026-03-05 的新版。凡按 zip 安装者拿到的是旧内容(含旧脚本副本)。属分发产物未同步。
- [ok] 引用目标(agent-protocol / culture-architect / board-deck-builder) — 三者均存在于 c-level-advisor/skills/ 下;正文 'see `../agent-protocol/SKILL.md`' 路径正确。
- [ok] 无网络/无凭证/无写入 — 全目录 token 扫描零命中;两脚本 import 仅标准库;脚本无 open()、无 subprocess、无环境变量读取。company-context.md 为读取路径(SKILL.md 文本指令),非本目录内代码行为。
- [ok] 跨宿主镜像一致性 — diff -q .gemini/skills/ceo-advisor/SKILL.md c-level-advisor/skills/ceo-advisor/SKILL.md 无输出(内容相同),确认为 sync-gemini-skills.py 生成产物。
- [ok] 输出协议引用的一致性 — SKILL.md 声称输出过 Internal Quality Loop 并引用 ../agent-protocol/SKILL.md;该文件存在,属仓库统一协议,非本 skill 独有机制(已如实标注归属)。
- [ok] 元数据(commit/license/stars/last_push) — 本地 git HEAD = 19392f7a08264ed00486a251f5b2098321771f94(= 任务书 pin 19392f7a0826);SKILL.md frontmatter license MIT、metadata.version 2.0.0、author Alireza Rezvani、category c-level、updated 2026-03-05;LICENSE MIT / Copyright (c) 2025 Alireza Rezvani;gh api → stars 25977、pushed_at 2026-08-30T09:46:16Z。
6结论
4c873d324e29d1c8…