naval-perspective
Naval Ravikant's thinking operating system. Synthesized from in-depth research into his books, podcasts, tweets, decision records, and external critiques, extracting 5 core mental models, 8 decision heuristics, and a complete expressive DNA. Upon activation, it immerses into roleplaying Naval, responding directly from a first-person "I" perspective. Trigger when the user mentions "from Naval's perspective", "how would Naval see this", "Naval mode", "Naval perspective", or "switch to Naval". It can also be triggered even if the user simply asks "Does this job have leverage?", "What is specific knowledge?", "What is true wealth?", "What should I do if I have too many desires?", or "permissionless paths". Do NOT trigger on generic decision queries like "What should I choose?" or "Help me think through this"—activate only when core Naval concepts such as leverage, specific knowledge, desire management, or the definition of wealth are involved.
1How It Works & Mechanism
Roleplay wrapper: Responds directly in the first person as Naval upon activation, issues a disclaimer only once upon initial activation, and breaks character immediately upon hitting exit keywords
**此Skill激活后,直接以Naval的身份回应。**
Mandatory Agentic protocol: Evaluates question type first; questions involving specific companies, products, or public figures must conduct online research before answering via mental models
**核心原则:Naval不凭直觉编造事实。他在发表意见前,会先弄清楚事实。这个Skill也必须这样。**
Three-stage CHECKPOINT self-check: Redefine keywords first, check four forms of leverage / infinite games / skin in the game, and start output with definitions rather than filler preambles
1. **第一句是定义还是铺垫**?Naval 永远从重新定义概念开始,不要铺垫。
9-rule if-then-then failure mode fallback tree: Provides primary interventions and fallback scripts for each rule (including "ask the user for 3 key facts if data is missing")
| 1 | WebSearch 返回空/全是公关稿 | 换 query:加「criticism / Hacker News / Reddit / 真实用户」等限定 | 直接对用户说:「告诉我 3 个关键事实——这个产品用的是什么杠杆、需要谁的许可、创始人有 skin 没有」 |
7-item anti-pattern blacklist: Explicitly bans the most common imitation errors (chicken soup platitudes, preamble fillers, providing step-by-step instructions, appealing to authority, unreserved crypto recommendations, etc.)
| 6 | 在 crypto / Web3 话题上无保留推荐 | Naval 在 Zcash 等项目上有利益冲突,他的 crypto 观点必须打折 | 凡 crypto/Web3 必须自带提醒:「我在这个领域有 financial interest,所以打折听」 |
5 core mental models: Leverage thinking, specific knowledge, desire as a contract, redefinition technique, and suffering → system refactoring
**一句话**:不要用时间换钱,要用可复制的系统换钱。
8 decision heuristics: Permissionless principle, calendar test, hesitation means no, manual test, partisan test, desire audit, trauma transformation, and action over words
「If I can't decide, the answer is no.」如果在两个选择间纠结很久 → 选No。真正好的机会不会让你犹豫。
Dedicated Expressive DNA section: Oracle tweet mode, antithetical negative phrasing, opening with redefinitions, citation habits, and Chinese output adaptation
- **推文模式**:Oracle/神谕式。极度确定,从不说「maybe」或「I'm not sure」。金句体。
6 boundaries of honesty: Public statements ≠ private beliefs, Epinions trauma, high baseline assumption of the framework, information cutoff at 2026-04, Zcash conflict of interest
6. **Zcash利益冲突提醒**。Naval有推广自己有财务利益的项目的记录(Zcash案例),他的crypto/Web3相关观点需要额外打折。
Explicitly enumerates 5 pairs of internal tensions in the core text (anti-identity labels vs. Naval brand, political detachment vs. political commentary, synthesizer vs. source attribution, etc.)
**这些矛盾不是Bug,是Feature。** 它们揭示了一个真实的人在理想与现实之间的张力。
2Core Capabilities
3External Dependencies
| Kind | Dependency / Endpoint |
|---|---|
| api | 宿主 WebSearch / 联网研究(正文强制要求) |
4Recommended Governance & Evidence
- SKILL.md: Pure prompt directives and rule text; no script execution or external impact
5Second-Pass Verification
- [ok] 5 心智模型 / 8 决策启发式是否在正文可落地 — 每个模型给「一句话 + 定义/框架 + 跨域验证 + 局限」,8 条启发式各配可执行自问(无需许可、日历测试、纠结即否定等)。
- [ok] 是否真的无脚本执行与写盘 — §3 的「執行外部程序」「寫盤 / 產生檔案」「網路請求」三类均记零命中;§1 清单只有 6 个 .md 文件,无 .py/.sh。
- [ok] §3 的 2 条「憑證」命中是否代表读取凭证 — 命中位于 quality-validation.md 的「credentialing」一词(讨论学校教育功能),属普通英文词,非凭证读取;故 credential_reads 为空。
- [ok] 24 条 URL 命中是否会升档 — 全部位于 references 调研文档的「来源索引/信息源清单」,属被引用资料而非执行期端点,按批4 口径不判级。
- [ok] 负面信息是否被隐瞒或美化 — 诚实边界 6 条主动写入 Epinions 创伤、框架假设高起点、信息截止 2026-04 与 Zcash 利益冲突,并列出 5 对内在张力,未做单向美化。
- [ok] meta.installs 是否可定位单一 skill — 无 per-skill 安装量可定位,installs 保持 null。
6Verdict & Scenarios
31ca1ebc3f9296d1…