ljg-invest
Investment analysis. Writes an in-depth investment analysis report for a given project (company name, pitch deck/BP, founder conversation logs). Steers away from traditional investment analysis—the core criterion is singular: whether this project is an "order-creation machine." Use when user says '投资报告', '投资分析', '分析这个项目', '写投资报告', 'investment report', 'invest analysis', or provides entrepreneur conversation records wanting investment evaluation. Also trigger when user pastes or references meeting notes, pitch decks, or founder interviews and asks for analysis.
1How It Works & Mechanism
The sole criterion for the entire report is whether the project creates a new order or merely transports an old order.
整份报告只回答一个问题:这个东西在创造新秩序,还是在搬运旧秩序。
Use the definition "wealth = order illuminated by desire" as the foundation of the entire report.
财富不是钱,是被欲望照亮的秩序,钱只是秩序的计量单位。
Accept inputs in any format and explicitly invoke an external Research skill/subagent to fetch the latest data instead of relying on outdated impressions.
知名公司只给名字就够——用 Research skill 或 subagent 抓最新财报和行业数据,别凭旧印象写。
The five report sections serve as a structural backbone rather than a fill-in-the-blank exercise; section length is dynamically allocated based on project substance.
五个区块是骨架,不是填空题。
The core judgment section answers only one question: whether this order-creation machine can actually spin, evaluated from three perspectives.
**这台机器转不转得起来?** 从三个角度看。
Overall judgment is classified into three tiers: Order-Creation Machine / Has Potential / Order Porter.
秩序创造机器——飞轮在转,冲击后变强,资源自己来…秩序搬运——把已有的东西重新排列,没有生出新秩序
Require distilling a one-sentence genesis formula for each machine, followed by interrogating its degree of validation and differentiation from competitors.
每台秩序创造机器都有一个核心算法,用一句话写出来。
Determine investment timing in the "What the Market Sees vs. What We See" section, centering on the cognitive gap caused by market labels.
市场给它贴了什么标签,这个标签遮住了什么,我们的框架多看到了什么。
Outputs are strictly org-mode, written to ~/Documents/notes/ and named according to denote conventions.
命名按 denote:`YYYYMMDDTHHMMSS==z--投资分析-PROJECT_NAME.org`
2Core Capabilities
4Recommended Governance & Evidence
- 本地工作目录: File read/write and artifact output: ~/Documents/notes/YYYYMMDDTHHMMSS==z--投资分析-<项目名>.org (written via host Write tool, inside skill directory)
5Second-Pass Verification
- [ok] 核心判据存在且唯一 — 正文首段「整份报告只回答一个问题」与结尾「最后一句」要求一致,全文未出现第二套判据。
- [ok] 三档判定的枚举完整 — §二给出秩序创造机器/有潜力/秩序搬运三档及各自条件,与引用逐字一致。
- [ok] denote 命名与输出目录 — §输出写死 org-mode、~/Documents/notes/ 与 `YYYYMMDDTHHMMSS==z--投资分析-PROJECT_NAME.org` 示例。
- [ok] 外部依赖是否真实存在 — 风险扫描六类均零命中;唯一外部动作为正文点名的 Research skill/subagent,属被点名他人技能而非本目录自带依赖,external_deps 据实留空。
- [ok] 凭证/网络/脚本三类是否漏报 — 逐行核对 SKILL.md,无 curl/wget、无 env/keychain、无 subprocess 或脚本文件;三个数组据实留空。
- [discrepancy] 写盘归属 — 第一遍按「skill 写文件」暂记,第二遍确认目录内无任何脚本,写 ~/Documents/notes/ 系正文指示宿主 Write 工具完成;file_writes 已注明由宿主执行。
- [ok] 禁用词与真实性规则一致性 — §生成规则第 1、2、4 条与 §输出一致,「查不到的直接标注,不硬撑,不编」逐字可定位。
6Verdict & Scenarios
fc63c06290bfa10a…