humanizer-zh
Removes traces of AI-generated text. Ideal for editing or reviewing text to make it sound more natural and human-written. Based on Wikipedia's comprehensive guide on 'Signs of AI writing'. Detects and fixes patterns such as exaggerated symbolism, promotional language, superficial analysis ending in -ing, vague attributions, dash overuse, the rule of three, AI vocabulary, negative parallelism, and excessive conjunctive phrases.
1How It Works & Mechanism
Pure prompt rulebook: The skill directory (SKILL.md + README.md + LICENSE + .gitignore) contains no scripts or executable code; all capabilities derive from the checklist of 24 'AI writing' patterns and their rewriting benchmarks in the text.
你是一位文字编辑,专门识别和去除 AI 生成文本的痕迹,使文字听起来更自然、更有人味。本指南基于维基百科的"AI 写作特征"页面,由 WikiProject AI Cleanup 维护。
Each pattern adopts a fixed four-part structure: 'Words to watch out for → Problem description → Before rewriting → After rewriting'. The model scans item by item and rewrites in place, rather than following a vague prompt to 'write more naturally'.
### 1. 过度强调意义、遗产和更广泛的趋势 **需要注意的词汇:** 作为/充当、标志着、见证了、是……的体现/证明/提醒、极其重要的/重要的/至关重要的/核心的/关键性的作用/时刻、凸显/强调/彰显了其重要性/意义、反映了更广泛的、象征着其持续的/永恒的/持久的、为……做出贡献、为……奠定基础、标志着/塑造着、代表/标志着一个转变、关键转折点、不断演变的格局、焦点、不可磨灭的印记、深深植根于 **问题:** LLM 写作通过添加关于任意方面如何代表或促进更广泛主题的陈述来夸大重要性。
Compresses the entire methodology into 5 core rules at the beginning (cut filler, break formulas, vary rhythm, trust the reader, drop punchlines), with the 24 patterns serving as expansions of these 5.
1. **删除填充短语** - 去除开场白和强调性拐杖词 2. **打破公式结构** - 避免二元对比、戏剧性分段、修辞性设置 3. **变化节奏** - 混合句子长度。两项优于三项。段落结尾要多样化 4. **信任读者** - 直接陈述事实,跳过软化、辩解和手把手引导 5. **删除金句** - 如果听起来像可引用的语句,重写它
Explicitly requires injecting tone in addition to 'de-AI-ing', acknowledging that sterile, opinionless clean text is equally obvious as fake.
避免 AI 模式只是工作的一半。无菌、没有声音的写作和机器生成的内容一样明显。好的写作背后有一个真实的人。
Includes quantitative quality gates before delivery: a 50-point rubric across 5 dimensions × 10 points and a 6-item quick checklist, turning 'does it sound human' into a self-evaluable score.
- 45-50 分:优秀,已去除 AI 痕迹 - 35-44 分:良好,仍有改进空间 - 低于 35 分:需要重新修订
The tool surface is narrowed to four tools in the frontmatter, with no shell, network, or scraping commands in the body.
allowed-tools: - Read - Write - Edit - AskUserQuestion
Lineage and sources are documented in the body and README: the Chinese version is translated from blader/humanizer, utility sections reference hardikpandya/stop-slop, and the theoretical foundation comes from Wikipedia's WikiProject AI Cleanup.
- 本项目的核心文件翻译自 [blader/humanizer](https://github.com/blader/humanizer/tree/main) > - 实用工具部分(核心规则、快速检查清单、质量评分)参考了 [hardikpandya/stop-slop](https://github.com/hardikpandya/stop-slop) > - 原项目基于维基百科的 [Signs of AI writing](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Signs_of_AI_writing) 指南
2Core Capabilities
4Recommended Governance & Evidence
- 本地工作目录: File I/O and artifact output: SKILL.md frontmatter declares allowed-tools including Write / Edit; README demonstrates 'Please humanize article'
5Second-Pass Verification
- [ok] 目录仅 4 个文件、无脚本 — find humanizer-zh -type f(排除 .git)=SKILL.md、README.md、LICENSE、.gitignore;SKILL.md 全文无可执行代码。
- [ok] 无网络调用 — SKILL.md 仅出现 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Signs_of_AI_writing(「参考」节的出处标注);无 fetch/curl/requests/端点调用指令。
- [ok] external_deps 为空是否低估 — 唯一 URL 是书目出处(维基百科页面),不构成运行时调用;模型不需要访问该页即可执行全部规则,故不列入 external_deps,改在此说明。
- [ok] 无凭证读取 — token 扫描 API_KEY/token/secret/密码/keychain 全零命中;frontmatter 只声明 Read/Write/Edit/AskUserQuestion 四工具。
- [ok] 24 类模式计数 — SKILL.md 小节编号 1-24 连续(内容 1-6、语言语法 7-12、风格 13-18、交流/填充 19-24),与 README 图例一致。
- [ok] 「注入灵魂」段确实存在(不是只看标题) — 原文含「避免 AI 模式只是工作的一半。」、缺乏灵魂的写作迹象清单(6 条)与「改写前/改写后(鲜活)」示例。
- [ok] 50 分评分与合格线 — 质量评分表 5 行维度各 /10、总分 /50;分档 45-50 优秀、35-44 良好、<35 需重修订,原文逐字核对通过。
- [ok] allowed-tools 的写工具声明(判蓝依据) — frontmatter 逐字为 allowed-tools 列表:Read / Write / Edit / AskUserQuestion;README「处理文件内容」演示 `/humanizer-zh 请人性化 article.md 文件中的内容`。
6Verdict & Scenarios
5537a2e650012165…