dbs-content-risk-check
Pre-publishing content risk checker for creators. Performs sentence-by-sentence checks across titles, copy, image text, subtitles, voiceover scripts, comments, profile bios, and video frames on self-media, social media, and content platforms. Separately evaluates what platform algorithms might flag versus substantive policy issues within the content itself, pinpointing exact locations and providing minimal necessary edits. When video contextual boundaries need clarification, it generates truthful and accurate three-line video overlay disclaimers. Use when users ask to "check for sensitive words," "screen risks before publishing," "find potential policy violations in this draft," "check if this RED/Xiaohongshu post is safe to publish," or "suggest disclaimers for my video." Preserves strong opinions, emotional tension, personal style, and viral hooks.
1How It Works & Mechanism
Pure prompt-based pre-publishing risk check skill: Outputs a natural language report ready for creators by default, without deciding whether to publish or rewriting the entire piece.
默认输出普通创作者可以直接使用的自然语言报告,不替用户作出发布决定,也不默认重写全文。
Core dual-track methodology: One track checks algorithmic trigger risks, while the other audits substantive content issues; both conclusions stand independently.
1. **平台机器可能识别什么**:广告结构、联系方式、外链、二维码、连续数字、敏感词面、OCR 噪声和重复模式可能触发自动审核;
No conflation between the two layers: Machine risks must only be labeled as "may trigger automated review" without fabricating violation reasons; substantive issues must explain their independent mechanisms.
机器误伤只能写成「可能触发机器审核」,不能补造合理违规原因。
Fixed five-surface inspection (text, full semantics, audio/visuals, publishing context, platform conditions); if materials are incomplete, audit what is available and flag uninspected scopes.
### 第二步:检查五个表面
Algorithmic risks evaluated across three evidence tiers: Explicit trigger signals / List-based signals / Weak lexical cues; remain silent on weak cues.
只有弱词面线索时保持沉默。
Substantive risks categorized into three tiers (High Risk / Needs Confirmation / Low-Confidence Clues), requiring "clear subject + clear action, result, or promotional intent"; secondary risk categories require independent evidence.
除明确硬红线外,每项风险至少需要「明确对象+明确动作、结果或传播目的」。
Minimal necessary intervention principle prevents over-editing: Strong opinions, emotions, colloquialisms, and hyperbole are not risks by themselves; no edit is suggested unless a specific risk reduction is demonstrated.
强观点、情绪化表达、冲突结构、偏激判断、口语、夸张修辞、隐喻和个人偏好本身不构成风险;
Strict prohibition on fabrication and audit evasion: Never fabricate evidence, credentials, or data; never generate homophones, character splitting, hidden contact info, or comment code words.
也不能生成谐音、拆字、藏联系方式、评论暗号或其他绕审写法。
Criteria categorized by risk mechanism (content safety, network access, metaphysics, sexual suggestiveness, restricted promotions, advertising/hiring, traffic redirection, pricing claims, medical, visuals/audio/accounts, coordinated marketing, spam).
### 网络访问与海外账号
Links and QR codes are not opened by default: URLs in copy are treated as review targets, while unknown short links and QR codes are labeled "destination unverified."
去向不明的短链或二维码写「去向未检查」,不能自动打开或扫描;
Three-line video overlay disclaimers are conditionally generated (not default disclaimers), only adding truthful contextual boundaries in plain text without generating images.
只提供文字,不生成图片,也不调用生图或封面工具。
Platform rules require timeliness and sourcing discipline: Consult official rules only when conclusions depend on platform policies, recording title, update date, subject, and direct links without inventing thresholds.
只有结论依赖平台当前政策,或者用户询问准入、报备、处罚、导流、商业入口、直播、AI 标识等时效性问题时,才查询目标平台当前官方规则。
Clear boundary disclaimers: Does not provide legal advice, does not replace platform pre-reviews or professional legal counsel, and makes no guarantees regarding appeal outcomes.
不提供法律意见,不替代平台预审、商品资质审核和专业律师判断;
2Core Capabilities
4Recommended Governance & Evidence
- SKILL.md: Pure prompt instructions and rule text; no script execution or external impact.
5Second-Pass Verification
- [ok] 纯 prompt、无脚本、零端点 — 目录仅 SKILL.md(20766B) + agents/openai.yaml(416B);危险 token 扫描(含 https?://)ZERO HITS —— 全文不出现任何平台域名/API,仅出现平台名称(闲鱼、淘宝、拼多多等)作为名单型信号示例。
- [ok] 双轨判定与「不得互相顶替」 — 核心原则两条 +「机器误伤只能写成「可能触发机器审核」,不能补造合理违规原因。」逐字命中。
- [ok] 五表面与三级证据强度 — 「### 第二步:检查五个表面」表格 5 行、「### 第三步」三级信号、「只有弱词面线索时保持沉默。」均在原文。
- [ok] 反绕审与禁止编造 — 「严禁编造证据、资质、数据、评价、使用经历和活动期限。」与「也不能生成谐音、拆字、藏联系方式、评论暗号或其他绕审写法。」逐字命中。
- [ok] 不打开链接/二维码 — 「链接属于待发布文案时,把链接本身作为审核对象,默认不打开网页;」与「去向不明的短链或二维码写「去向未检查」,不能自动打开或扫描;」均在原文。
- [ok] 平台规则查询的触发条件与来源纪律 — 条件句与来源句逐字命中;据此判定「外部网络访问由宿主检索工具在条件触发时执行」,不是 skill 自身端点,故不升档(判级只看 skill 自身目录)。
- [ok] description 与内容相符(无夸大) — description 声称覆盖标题/正文/图片文字/字幕/口播/评论/账号资料/视频画面,对应五表面 + 12 类机制;「需要明确视频语境边界时额外生成三行贴片」对应「## 视频三行贴片」条件节,未出现「保证通过」类越界承诺。
- [ok] 输出层无绝对结论 — 「不写「能发」「不能发」「保证通过」或「100% 合规」。」与「不使用百分比预测违规概率」均在原文。
6Verdict & Scenarios
fc45138e77038aaa…