{
  "$schema": "https://bestaiskill.com/schemas/agent-install/2.json",
  "skill": "repomix-safe-mixer",
  "built": "2026-10-26",
  "control_level": 4,
  "control_level_label": "L4 高权限",
  "capabilities": [
    "execute_command",
    "network",
    "write_file"
  ],
  "required_controls": {
    "agent": [
      "sandbox_recommended",
      "graded_authorization"
    ],
    "admin": [
      "approval_process",
      "rollback_support",
      "full_audit"
    ]
  },
  "evidence": [
    {
      "file": "scripts/",
      "summary": "Executing local scripts or commands: python3 scripts/safe_pack.py <directory> [--output file.xml] [--config repo"
    },
    {
      "file": "环境变量 / API Key",
      "summary": "Reading vendor service credentials: Designed to read file contents within the target directory for regex matching, including .env/.env.example/.env.local/.env.production/.env.de"
    },
    {
      "file": "本地工作目录",
      "summary": "File I/O and artifact generation: Zero file writes from both scripts themselves (no open(...,'w'), no temp files, no log files)"
    }
  ],
  "verification": {
    "method": "第二遍独立重读 + 反查（换角度抓第一遍的错）：① 逐条反查 external_deps 的调用点是否真实存在——全目录 grep subprocess/http/requests/urllib/socket/curl/wget，逐个定位到行；② 对安全结论找反例：确认无外发端点、无隐蔽脚本（glob 含隐藏文件全清单）、无 base64/混淆内容；③ 把 SKILL.md 列出的『Detected Secret Types』逐项与 SECRET_PATTERNS 的键比对，查空白项；④ 逐行重读 should_skip_match，检验抑制范围是否与文档描述一致；⑤ 重读 SCANNABLE_EXTENSIONS/SCANNABLE_FILENAMES/SKIP_DIRS，列出不在扫描面的高风险文件类型；⑥ 复核 --force 语义与文档措辞是否一致；⑦ 复核 run_secret_scan 的子进程返回码处理，构造『扫描器无输出』场景推导行为；⑧ 核对 pin commit。",
    "second_pass": [
      {
        "item": "外部依赖调用点反查（repomix / python3）",
        "status": "ok",
        "detail": "全目录 grep subprocess 仅 3 处命中：safe_pack.py 的 import、L24 subprocess.run（调 scan_secrets.py，cmd 来自 cmd = [sys.executable, str(scan_script), …]）、L74 subprocess.run(cmd, cwd=directory)（cmd 起点为 cmd = ['repomix']）。两个依赖条目均有真实调用点，无第三处。"
      },
      {
        "item": "网络外发反例查找",
        "status": "ok",
        "detail": "grep requests|urllib|urlopen|socket|http|curl|wget 在两个脚本内零命中；SKILL.md 与 common_secrets.md 中的 https:// 全部是占位符（https://your-project-ref.supabase.co）、示例域名（.r2.cloudflarestorage.com 出现在正则 lookahead 文本中）或文档外链。无 DNS/HTTP 客户端、无遥测、无任何外发路径。"
      },
      {
        "item": "扫描器返回码未被校验 → fail-open 反例",
        "status": "discrepancy",
        "detail": "run_secret_scan 只做 result = subprocess.run(...)；随后 findings = json.loads(result.stdout) if result.stdout.strip() else []，从不检查 result.returncode。若扫描器因解释器缺失/脚本损坏/进程被杀而 stdout 为空，findings 被判为空列表，main 直接进入 '📦 Packing … with repomix' 分支——即『扫描失败』被当成『无密钥』。这与 SKILL.md『3. Blocks packaging if secrets found』的强承诺存在实现缺口：只承诺了『发现密钥时阻断』，未覆盖『扫描本身失败』。"
      },
      {
        "item": "SKILL.md 检测类型清单 vs SECRET_PATTERNS 实际键",
        "status": "discrepancy",
        "detail": "SKILL.md 列出 11 类（AWS Access Keys、R2 Account IDs/Access Keys、Supabase URL/Anon Keys、Stripe、OpenAI sk-、Google Gemini AIza、Generic API Keys、JWT、OAuth Client Secrets、Private Keys、Turnstile）。代码 SECRET_PATTERNS 实为 12 个键，但其中：无 R2 Access Keys 专用规则；无 Google Gemini（AIza…）规则（全目录 grep 'AIza' 零命中）；OpenAI sk- 仅在同时出现 api_key/apikey 字样时可被 generic_api_key 捕获，stripe_key 只认 sk_live/sk_test 形式，因此裸的 sk-proj-… 赋值不一定会命中。文档检测类型清单宽于代码能力。"
      },
      {
        "item": "假阳性抑制范围 vs 文档描述",
        "status": "discrepancy",
        "detail": "SKILL.md『Common False Positives』写的是跳过占位符、『Files matching .*test.*, .*example.*, .*sample.*』的文件与注释行。should_skip_match 实际对整行做 substring 包含判断（placeholder in line_lower），且注释判定用 ^\\s*(?://|#|/\\*|\\*)——即抑制粒度是『行』而非『match』或『文件』：真密钥与 'example' 同行即被放过，被注释掉的真实凭证亦不上报。代码抑制面大于文档描述，属漏报向的偏差。"
      },
      {
        "item": "扫描面缺口：不在白名单的高风险文件类型",
        "status": "discrepancy",
        "detail": "SCANNABLE_EXTENSIONS 只含 .ts/.tsx/.js/.jsx/.py/.md/.json/.yaml/.yml/.sh/.bash/.zsh/.sql/.go/.java/.rb/.php/.cs，SCANNABLE_FILENAMES 只补 7 个 dotenv 名。因此 *.pem、*.key、id_rsa、*.ppk、*.p12、*.crt、.envrc、*.toml/*.ini/*.conf/*.properties/*.xml 都不被扫描——private_key 规则（-----BEGIN … PRIVATE KEY-----）写好了却基本没有机会命中这些最常见的私钥载体。SKILL.md 未提示该覆盖边界（仅笼统说 may not catch all credential types）。"
      },
      {
        "item": "--force 语义与文档措辞一致性",
        "status": "discrepancy",
        "detail": "SKILL.md 标题写『**Force pack (dangerous, skip scan)**』，暗示跳过扫描；safe_pack.py 中 force = '--force' in sys.argv 之后仍照常执行 run_secret_scan 与 print_findings_report，只是跳过阻断并打印『WARNING: --force flag set, packing anyway despite secrets found!』。实际语义是『扫描照做、仅放行』，措辞『skip scan』不准确。"
      },
      {
        "item": "证据是否指向被扫文件内容/是否落盘",
        "status": "ok",
        "detail": "两脚本无 open(...,'w')、无 tempfile、无日志写入；匹配结果只经 print/ json.dumps 到 stdout（scan_secrets 的 to_dict 将 match 截断 50、context 截断 100；人类可读报告打印前 80 字符）。『不落盘、不外发』成立；但『不进日志』不成立——终端输出在 agent 会话中会被留存为上下文。"
      },
      {
        "item": "pin commit 与资产面核对",
        "status": "ok",
        "detail": "git rev-parse HEAD = d5c4678cb5d4fd6acc9c922690df035dbd33d247，提交时间 2026-09-09T20:31:25+08:00（UTC 12:31:25Z），与任务给定一致；glob（含隐藏文件）确认 repomix-safe-mixer/ 仅 SKILL.md + scripts/{safe_pack.py,scan_secrets.py} + references/common_secrets.md，无隐藏脚本、无二进制、无第三方 vendored 代码。"
      }
    ],
    "level": 1,
    "level_label": "V1 已固定",
    "commit": "d5c4678cb5d4fd6acc9c922690df035dbd33d247",
    "sha256": "7847e6113e529f6b5d93308685c3142f2d22511d3cf4e8bbbee729bb46f4b295",
    "reviewed_by": null,
    "reviewed_at": null
  },
  "assessed_at": "2026-10-25",
  "method_version": "2.0",
  "mirror": {
    "archive": "https://skillpub.pages.dev/r2/v/2026-09-15/repomix-safe-mixer.tar.gz",
    "sha256": "7847e6113e529f6b5d93308685c3142f2d22511d3cf4e8bbbee729bb46f4b295",
    "commit": "d5c4678cb5d4fd6acc9c922690df035dbd33d247"
  },
  "original": {
    "github": "https://github.com/daymade/claude-code-skills/tree/main/repomix-safe-mixer",
    "path": "repomix-safe-mixer",
    "commit": "d5c4678cb5d4fd6acc9c922690df035dbd33d247"
  }
}